<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Now Good for You, Still Bad for Some</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/</link>
	<description>Commentary on puzzling things in life, nature, science, weather, climate change, technology, and recent news by Anthony Watts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:24:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David S</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18393</link>
		<dc:creator>David S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18393</guid>
		<description>Anthony you&#039;ve been been very good about allowing free speech on your website. That&#039;s most commendable, but I think MA demonstrated a need for some modest blogging rules at &quot;Watts Up With That&quot;. My suggestion would be to ban rudeness and profanity. MA would be bounced for his (her?) extreme rudeness. Also certain words should be banned at the discretion of the moderator. For example &quot;hell&quot; is OK when used in a phrase like &quot;hell freezes over&quot;, but not OK when preceded by &quot;Go to&quot;. 

Just a suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony you&#8217;ve been been very good about allowing free speech on your website. That&#8217;s most commendable, but I think MA demonstrated a need for some modest blogging rules at &#8220;Watts Up With That&#8221;. My suggestion would be to ban rudeness and profanity. MA would be bounced for his (her?) extreme rudeness. Also certain words should be banned at the discretion of the moderator. For example &#8220;hell&#8221; is OK when used in a phrase like &#8220;hell freezes over&#8221;, but not OK when preceded by &#8220;Go to&#8221;. </p>
<p>Just a suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Cheetham</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18298</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cheetham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18298</guid>
		<description>Hi Anthony:

I can help out some. I spend quite a bit of time investigating &quot;global warming&quot; and documenting the science on my website:
http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming 

Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anthony:</p>
<p>I can help out some. I spend quite a bit of time investigating &#8220;global warming&#8221; and documenting the science on my website:<br />
<a href="http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming" rel="nofollow">http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming</a> </p>
<p>Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeeztheadmin</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18296</link>
		<dc:creator>jeeztheadmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18296</guid>
		<description>Uh sure....

*looks at ground and twists foot embarrassingly*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh sure&#8230;.</p>
<p>*looks at ground and twists foot embarrassingly*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeeztheadmin</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18292</link>
		<dc:creator>jeeztheadmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18292</guid>
		<description>After my first day of mod duty, basically hitting the approve button with a couple of exceptions, I must say that this is likely the most creative and rewarding endeavor with which I&#039;ve ever been involved.

Thanks Anthony.

&lt;strong&gt;REPLY:&lt;/strong&gt; Just an FYI, &quot;Jeez&quot; is our first guest moderator, to help me take the load off. He&#039;s also a person I&#039;ve met and trust. He&#039;ll keep the blog honest when I&#039;m too busy chasing weather stations or writing entries. The hundreds of comments that now come through daily have become such a chore to moderate to keep clean and sensible that I had been falling behind in my primary mission. Surfacestations.org  Thank Jeez.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After my first day of mod duty, basically hitting the approve button with a couple of exceptions, I must say that this is likely the most creative and rewarding endeavor with which I&#8217;ve ever been involved.</p>
<p>Thanks Anthony.</p>
<p><strong>REPLY:</strong> Just an FYI, &#8220;Jeez&#8221; is our first guest moderator, to help me take the load off. He&#8217;s also a person I&#8217;ve met and trust. He&#8217;ll keep the blog honest when I&#8217;m too busy chasing weather stations or writing entries. The hundreds of comments that now come through daily have become such a chore to moderate to keep clean and sensible that I had been falling behind in my primary mission. Surfacestations.org  Thank Jeez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Carr</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18286</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18286</guid>
		<description>Regarding the volunteer above named &quot;&lt;b&gt;cohenite&lt;/b&gt;&quot;:
Having read him over some time on another blog I will vouch for him as a very reasonable, knowledgeable, calm and balanced man you could, Anthony, I am sure depend on to maintain quality control here. (Nice sense of humour, too.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the volunteer above named &#8220;<b>cohenite</b>&#8220;:<br />
Having read him over some time on another blog I will vouch for him as a very reasonable, knowledgeable, calm and balanced man you could, Anthony, I am sure depend on to maintain quality control here. (Nice sense of humour, too.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Chamberlain</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18202</link>
		<dc:creator>James Chamberlain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18202</guid>
		<description>Happy to help out.  Let me know through my e-mail if I can assist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy to help out.  Let me know through my e-mail if I can assist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nirveda</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18196</link>
		<dc:creator>nirveda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18196</guid>
		<description>Well,i think i can volunteer...but you need to make it clear what exactly you expect from a potential moderator so that we can cross check</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,i think i can volunteer&#8230;but you need to make it clear what exactly you expect from a potential moderator so that we can cross check</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwampWoman</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18175</link>
		<dc:creator>SwampWoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18175</guid>
		<description>&quot;Will Blog for Food!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Will Blog for Food!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Reid</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18157</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18157</guid>
		<description>Anthony,

I am not a climatologist, a meteorologist or an astrophysicist. I have never played a climatologist, a meteorologist or an astrophysicist on TV. I did not stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. However, I am technically educated, broadly experienced and capable of comprehensive research, intelligent thought and logical reasoning. 

My resume is posted on my website. I am willing to help on a part time basis, based on the promised compensation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony,</p>
<p>I am not a climatologist, a meteorologist or an astrophysicist. I have never played a climatologist, a meteorologist or an astrophysicist on TV. I did not stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. However, I am technically educated, broadly experienced and capable of comprehensive research, intelligent thought and logical reasoning. </p>
<p>My resume is posted on my website. I am willing to help on a part time basis, based on the promised compensation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Alberts</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18152</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Alberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18152</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind helping out, Anthony. I&#039;m in front of this friggin&#039; computer all day, might as well make myself useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind helping out, Anthony. I&#8217;m in front of this friggin&#8217; computer all day, might as well make myself useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18149</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18149</guid>
		<description>Well, it certainly seems to stimulate the adrenal glands on occasion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it certainly seems to stimulate the adrenal glands on occasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cohenite</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18148</link>
		<dc:creator>cohenite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18148</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s the kitchen sink?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s the kitchen sink?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18146</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18146</guid>
		<description>Blogging appears to be recapitulating the history of newspapers.  What started out as letters among friends then became broadsides aimed at public consumptions which soon required writer/editors and printshops.  Those evolved into businesses with daily issues and eventually consolidated into news organizations with worldwide distribution.  Of course, the blogging technology short cuts some steps, but isn&#039;t it curious that the simple blog is becoming a multi-person enterprise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogging appears to be recapitulating the history of newspapers.  What started out as letters among friends then became broadsides aimed at public consumptions which soon required writer/editors and printshops.  Those evolved into businesses with daily issues and eventually consolidated into news organizations with worldwide distribution.  Of course, the blogging technology short cuts some steps, but isn&#8217;t it curious that the simple blog is becoming a multi-person enterprise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18144</link>
		<dc:creator>John A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18144</guid>
		<description>No thanks. I like my sleep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No thanks. I like my sleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGrats</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18143</link>
		<dc:creator>McGrats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18143</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been alluding to this happening for some time now. I used to own a dial-up &quot;blog&quot; (then called a BBS) back in the late 80&#039;s and early 90&#039;s and I know how time consuming it can be!

I&#039;d love to help Tony, but with TMCP and everything else coming together all at once, I&#039;m over my head already. Fortunately, one of your bloggers has volunteered to help me and I&#039;ll be getting him activated within a week or so.

But first, I have to put food on the table as a Network Consultant with clients across the Nation.

Jack Koenig, Editor
The Mysterious Climate Project
www.climateclinic.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been alluding to this happening for some time now. I used to own a dial-up &#8220;blog&#8221; (then called a BBS) back in the late 80&#8217;s and early 90&#8217;s and I know how time consuming it can be!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to help Tony, but with TMCP and everything else coming together all at once, I&#8217;m over my head already. Fortunately, one of your bloggers has volunteered to help me and I&#8217;ll be getting him activated within a week or so.</p>
<p>But first, I have to put food on the table as a Network Consultant with clients across the Nation.</p>
<p>Jack Koenig, Editor<br />
The Mysterious Climate Project<br />
<a href="http://www.climateclinic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.climateclinic.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Carr</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18136</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18136</guid>
		<description>I consider you gave &quot;MA&quot; far, far too much time; and courtesy, Anthony.  It also clogged the blog for (at least me) your readers. I would rather know the time had been spent with your children, or pursuing matters which we have come to look to you for.
      I will certainly applaud any who come to your aid as moderators; and support those who have a sharp pen when pushed unreasonably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider you gave &#8220;MA&#8221; far, far too much time; and courtesy, Anthony.  It also clogged the blog for (at least me) your readers. I would rather know the time had been spent with your children, or pursuing matters which we have come to look to you for.<br />
      I will certainly applaud any who come to your aid as moderators; and support those who have a sharp pen when pushed unreasonably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeez</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18130</link>
		<dc:creator>jeez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18130</guid>
		<description>I volunteer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I volunteer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheronerose</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18123</link>
		<dc:creator>sheronerose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18123</guid>
		<description>Yeah Blogging is always good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Blogging is always good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Llewelyn</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/09/blogging-now-good-for-you-still-bad-for-some/#comment-18122</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Llewelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1349#comment-18122</guid>
		<description>Unrelated, but thought you might want to know, Gistemp data in: J0.14 F0.25 M0.58 A0.41 M0.36. So still positive if you adjust: 0.12 and higher than both january and february, which clashes with satellites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unrelated, but thought you might want to know, Gistemp data in: J0.14 F0.25 M0.58 A0.41 M0.36. So still positive if you adjust: 0.12 and higher than both january and february, which clashes with satellites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
