<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOAA reports on our cooler than normal spring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:38:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: trampledclass</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-20392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trampledclass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-20392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you saying that when it comes to climate change BBC is like the slanted FOX NEWS NETWORK when it comes to politics?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying that when it comes to climate change BBC is like the slanted FOX NEWS NETWORK when it comes to politics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Change Visible in Rural Alaska &#124; ChannelBV</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-19591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climate Change Visible in Rural Alaska &#124; ChannelBV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-19591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] record snowfall, an unseasonably cool spring and predictions for increased hurricanes this season encourage discussion about climate change, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] record snowfall, an unseasonably cool spring and predictions for increased hurricanes this season encourage discussion about climate change, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Cull</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-18132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Cull]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-18132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M White wrote: &quot;I’d just like to inform everyone that the BBC has become a priest in Church of Global Warming.&quot; 

This is something I have noticed too - the BBC does put a great deal of pro-AGW spin in their reports; no way are they even attempting to be objective. And when data emerges that contradicts the &quot;emerging truth&quot; of global warming - they don&#039;t tend to report it. Look on the BBC news website for anything to do with the Argo system of buoys, which recently reported oceanic cooling since 2003, and I don&#039;t think you will find any coverage for the last few years. Or how about the German Polarstern expedition, which recently discovered that the deep ocean around Antarctica is cooling? Nope, nothing about that either. Yet if you look in the Science/Nature section now, you will find an article about the New Zealand government urging the citizens to kick the &quot;carbon habit&quot;. Yes, that will be reported because it&#039;s on-message. I like the BBC in other ways, as they often make decent TV programmes, and I watch the BBC morning news, but when it comes to anything to do with climate, the environment etc., it&#039;s well to be aware that they have a very obvious bias.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M White wrote: &#8220;I’d just like to inform everyone that the BBC has become a priest in Church of Global Warming.&#8221; </p>
<p>This is something I have noticed too &#8211; the BBC does put a great deal of pro-AGW spin in their reports; no way are they even attempting to be objective. And when data emerges that contradicts the &#8220;emerging truth&#8221; of global warming &#8211; they don&#8217;t tend to report it. Look on the BBC news website for anything to do with the Argo system of buoys, which recently reported oceanic cooling since 2003, and I don&#8217;t think you will find any coverage for the last few years. Or how about the German Polarstern expedition, which recently discovered that the deep ocean around Antarctica is cooling? Nope, nothing about that either. Yet if you look in the Science/Nature section now, you will find an article about the New Zealand government urging the citizens to kick the &#8220;carbon habit&#8221;. Yes, that will be reported because it&#8217;s on-message. I like the BBC in other ways, as they often make decent TV programmes, and I watch the BBC morning news, but when it comes to anything to do with climate, the environment etc., it&#8217;s well to be aware that they have a very obvious bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Gray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have rather seen temps based on geographic ecosystem areas: Mountains, plains, valleys, high desert, low desert, temperate forest, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have rather seen temps based on geographic ecosystem areas: Mountains, plains, valleys, high desert, low desert, temperate forest, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup &#187; Pirate&#8217;s Cove&#160;&#8212;&#160;Give No Quarter!</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup &#187; Pirate&#8217;s Cove&#160;&#8212;&#160;Give No Quarter!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Watts Up With That? reports on the cooler then usual spring [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Watts Up With That? reports on the cooler then usual spring [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bikermailman</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bikermailman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 02:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That Texas average of above normal for May, dunno about that here in the Panhandle.  We were below normal in may until the last week or so.  Big state, funny how they get an average for it that is reliable for the individual area.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Texas average of above normal for May, dunno about that here in the Panhandle.  We were below normal in may until the last week or so.  Big state, funny how they get an average for it that is reliable for the individual area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 16:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn&#039;t the 34th coolest, it was the 79th warmest on record (2008-1895-34). See how easy it is to warm things up?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t the 34th coolest, it was the 79th warmest on record (2008-1895-34). See how easy it is to warm things up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGrats</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGrats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[papertiger wrote: &quot;We’ve had like two days of warm weather this year in Sacramento Cal. The rest has averaged 10 degrees below normal. And NOAA calls that neutral.&quot;

As I viewed the report ealier, I was dwelling along those same lines: what are these &quot;near normal&quot; and &quot;neutral&quot; things? What range do they cover? And as far as that goes, what makes an average temp fall in certain range anyhow? What are the parameters... or is it simply a &quot;fudge&quot; factor devised by the Pogies to morph one set of figures into a &quot;box&quot; so it doesn&#039;t make their agenda look so bad?

Jack Koenig, Editor
The Mycterious Climate Project
www.climateclinic.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>papertiger wrote: &#8220;We’ve had like two days of warm weather this year in Sacramento Cal. The rest has averaged 10 degrees below normal. And NOAA calls that neutral.&#8221;</p>
<p>As I viewed the report ealier, I was dwelling along those same lines: what are these &#8220;near normal&#8221; and &#8220;neutral&#8221; things? What range do they cover? And as far as that goes, what makes an average temp fall in certain range anyhow? What are the parameters&#8230; or is it simply a &#8220;fudge&#8221; factor devised by the Pogies to morph one set of figures into a &#8220;box&#8221; so it doesn&#8217;t make their agenda look so bad?</p>
<p>Jack Koenig, Editor<br />
The Mycterious Climate Project<br />
<a href="http://www.climateclinic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.climateclinic.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in SC</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve in SC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Down here in SC May was very comfy.
In June it is like somebody threw a switch.  For the last week we have been within reach of record highs.  No rain for the last 6 weeks either.  The temperature will be what it will be but if anybody has any spare rain, send it my way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Down here in SC May was very comfy.<br />
In June it is like somebody threw a switch.  For the last week we have been within reach of record highs.  No rain for the last 6 weeks either.  The temperature will be what it will be but if anybody has any spare rain, send it my way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M White</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi

I’d just like to inform everyone that the BBC has become a priest in Church of Global Warming.
Last year it reported on the results of an experiment to predict the future impact of “Global Warming” using distributed computing. Full details of this experiment can be seen at 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/climateexperiment/

Given that the BBC is one of the worlds most respected news organisations it doesn&#039;t seem to present an unbiased view, you’d be hard pressed to find an alternate view on what drives the worlds climate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I’d just like to inform everyone that the BBC has become a priest in Church of Global Warming.<br />
Last year it reported on the results of an experiment to predict the future impact of “Global Warming” using distributed computing. Full details of this experiment can be seen at </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/climateexperiment/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/climateexperiment/</a></p>
<p>Given that the BBC is one of the worlds most respected news organisations it doesn&#8217;t seem to present an unbiased view, you’d be hard pressed to find an alternate view on what drives the worlds climate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve H</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“But there is no freakin’ way that hundreds of years of progress is going anywhere.”

I nominate this as the quote of the day!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“But there is no freakin’ way that hundreds of years of progress is going anywhere.”</p>
<p>I nominate this as the quote of the day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Carr</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Carr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Evan Jones&lt;/b&gt; (19:09): &lt;i&gt;&quot;But there is no freakin’ way that hundreds of years of progress is going anywhere.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
Sweet, Evan! Great line (you&#039;ll make &quot;Rev&quot; yet...).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Evan Jones</b> (19:09): <i>&#8220;But there is no freakin’ way that hundreds of years of progress is going anywhere.&#8221;</i><br />
Sweet, Evan! Great line (you&#8217;ll make &#8220;Rev&#8221; yet&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papertiger</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[papertiger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;ve had like two days of warm weather this year in Sacramento Cal. The rest has averaged 10 degrees below normal. 
And NOAA calls that neutral. The bozos are definitely running the show.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve had like two days of warm weather this year in Sacramento Cal. The rest has averaged 10 degrees below normal.<br />
And NOAA calls that neutral. The bozos are definitely running the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Texas</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom in Texas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Perhaps cooler temperatures will accelerate global warming.&quot;

Then we get even cooler temps still.  This global warming feedback will send us into the LIA, or over a tipping point into a real ice age.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Perhaps cooler temperatures will accelerate global warming.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then we get even cooler temps still.  This global warming feedback will send us into the LIA, or over a tipping point into a real ice age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Jones</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/06/noaa-reports-on-our-cooler-than-normal-spring/#comment-17532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1328#comment-17532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SteveS: 

You are probably correct as far as the temperatures are concerned. And yes, bozos are, and remain, bozos.  

But there is no freakin&#039; way that hundreds of years of progress is going anywhere.

There will be growth. Lower growth, yes, But growth. There is an incredible power at work. We are at the &quot;economic tipping point&quot; at the gateway ro &quot;runaway wealth&quot;. The only way that could be stopped is by asinine politics. It is very probably beyond the power of mother nature alone.

You seem to buy into the notion that modern tech is less relsilient than the simplicity of the past. It ain&#039;t so. Ireland starved for decades on account of a cooling and the wrong sort of potato. That could never happen in this day and age. Our adaptive power is awesome. And unappreciated!

Sheesh! You make my off-center quotes on the solar threads seem optimistic!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SteveS: </p>
<p>You are probably correct as far as the temperatures are concerned. And yes, bozos are, and remain, bozos.  </p>
<p>But there is no freakin&#8217; way that hundreds of years of progress is going anywhere.</p>
<p>There will be growth. Lower growth, yes, But growth. There is an incredible power at work. We are at the &#8220;economic tipping point&#8221; at the gateway ro &#8220;runaway wealth&#8221;. The only way that could be stopped is by asinine politics. It is very probably beyond the power of mother nature alone.</p>
<p>You seem to buy into the notion that modern tech is less relsilient than the simplicity of the past. It ain&#8217;t so. Ireland starved for decades on account of a cooling and the wrong sort of potato. That could never happen in this day and age. Our adaptive power is awesome. And unappreciated!</p>
<p>Sheesh! You make my off-center quotes on the solar threads seem optimistic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

