<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An open letter to environmentalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Open Letter to Environmentalists &#124; Family Values Politics</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-18842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An Open Letter to Environmentalists &#124; Family Values Politics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-18842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Chief Meteorologist of KUSI-TX in San Diego.  John has a Phd in meteorology. Click here to read, An Open Letter to Environmentalists   http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/    Between [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chief Meteorologist of KUSI-TX in San Diego.  John has a Phd in meteorology. Click here to read, An Open Letter to Environmentalists   <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/" rel="nofollow">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/</a>    Between [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weather Channel Founder Makes Another Challenge to Gore &#171; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-18749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weather Channel Founder Makes Another Challenge to Gore &#171; Watts Up With That?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-18749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A guest post by John Coleman, founder of The Weather Channel, and Chief Meteorologist of KUSI-TV in San Diego. See his previous challenge published here called &#8220;An Open Letter to Environmentalists&#8220; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A guest post by John Coleman, founder of The Weather Channel, and Chief Meteorologist of KUSI-TV in San Diego. See his previous challenge published here called &#8220;An Open Letter to Environmentalists&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global weather</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-15349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[global weather]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-15349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] commitment to science. The science behind the &amp;quotglobal warming scare&amp;quot is bad, and no anthrohttp://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/SSEC - Images and Dataincluding the SSEC global Montage, Rotating Globe movie, and Antarctic [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] commitment to science. The science behind the &#38;quotglobal warming scare&#38;quot is bad, and no anthrohttp://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/SSEC &#8211; Images and Dataincluding the SSEC global Montage, Rotating Globe movie, and Antarctic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurricane Seasonal Forecasting and More! &#124; KATC StormTeam 3 Weather BLOG</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-15303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hurricane Seasonal Forecasting and More! &#124; KATC StormTeam 3 Weather BLOG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-15303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] not over.   Now for those of you looking for a really different tilt on Global Warming, check out John Coleman’s Rant about the subject.  Coleman was the founder of the Weather Channel, but his views while on the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not over.   Now for those of you looking for a really different tilt on Global Warming, check out John Coleman’s Rant about the subject.  Coleman was the founder of the Weather Channel, but his views while on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dx weather</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-14092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dx weather]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-14092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] commitment to science. The science behind the &amp;quotglobal warming scare&amp;quot is bad, and no anthrohttp://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/DX Toolbox - Shortwave / Ham Radio / HF Radio Propagation ToolDX Toolbox - Shortwave HF Radio [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] commitment to science. The science behind the &#38;quotglobal warming scare&#38;quot is bad, and no anthrohttp://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/DX Toolbox &#8211; Shortwave / Ham Radio / HF Radio Propagation ToolDX Toolbox &#8211; Shortwave HF Radio [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om du inte är med oss så är du emot oss &#171; Skiften</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-14064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om du inte är med oss så är du emot oss &#171; Skiften]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-14064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] är för övrigt en skeptikers tankar om det hela: &#8220;Here’s what’s wrong with that: the science is not valid. There is no [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] är för övrigt en skeptikers tankar om det hela: &#8220;Here’s what’s wrong with that: the science is not valid. There is no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Gray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-14045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-14045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[re: ice caps on Mars

I do know that NASA has determined that these icecaps grow and shrink on a regular basis showing both short term and long term cycles (the icecap edges show these changes much like old shore lines do).  What could possibly be causing these cycles?  I am wondering if there is a correlation between temperature signatures and icecap cycles on Mars with what has been measured here on Earth.  I sure wish we had a rover that would head over there to collect ice core samples.  Wouldn&#039;t it be interesting if we find correlations all over the place?  If correlations are found, it would be very hard to continue the argument for man-made causes re: temperature change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: ice caps on Mars</p>
<p>I do know that NASA has determined that these icecaps grow and shrink on a regular basis showing both short term and long term cycles (the icecap edges show these changes much like old shore lines do).  What could possibly be causing these cycles?  I am wondering if there is a correlation between temperature signatures and icecap cycles on Mars with what has been measured here on Earth.  I sure wish we had a rover that would head over there to collect ice core samples.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be interesting if we find correlations all over the place?  If correlations are found, it would be very hard to continue the argument for man-made causes re: temperature change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Inquirer</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-13952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An Inquirer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 04:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-13952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I read the AP artricle in which Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University and others were provided opportunities to take uncontested free shots in regards to polar ice trends.  One quote that has gotten some attention here:
    Francis added: “Over this entire fall, winter and right up ’till today the ice
    concentration, the amount of ice that’s floating around on the Arctic, has
    been below normal every single day.”

As has been suggested, Francis is taking quite a bit of liberty in determining what is &quot;normal.&quot;  Implicitly, she is saying that normal is what the satellites measured between 1979 and 2000.  She would not be correct if we took the years 2000-2006 to be normal.  Plus, we have enough ancedotal evidence to suggest that 1979-2000 levels have not been consistently normal over the past couple of centuries.

When I hear John Coleman say that &quot;The Arctic is back to normal,&quot;  I understand that to be an approximate statement that in essence reflects the general conditions.  I believe everyone who follows global ice realizes that the much of the ice is new.  It is reported not to be thinner in all places.  Also an interesting note:  there are places around the Bering Sea now covered in ice that were actually ice-free in 1980.

Let us remember that some scientists have said that Artic Ice will be gone by 2013.  Let us see whether Coleman&#039;s statement turns out to be more accurate than that projection.

For those that take hope in news of Southern Hemispheric ice is expansion:  a  a colder climate most likely not a desired outcome for the human race.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I read the AP artricle in which Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University and others were provided opportunities to take uncontested free shots in regards to polar ice trends.  One quote that has gotten some attention here:<br />
    Francis added: “Over this entire fall, winter and right up ’till today the ice<br />
    concentration, the amount of ice that’s floating around on the Arctic, has<br />
    been below normal every single day.”</p>
<p>As has been suggested, Francis is taking quite a bit of liberty in determining what is &#8220;normal.&#8221;  Implicitly, she is saying that normal is what the satellites measured between 1979 and 2000.  She would not be correct if we took the years 2000-2006 to be normal.  Plus, we have enough ancedotal evidence to suggest that 1979-2000 levels have not been consistently normal over the past couple of centuries.</p>
<p>When I hear John Coleman say that &#8220;The Arctic is back to normal,&#8221;  I understand that to be an approximate statement that in essence reflects the general conditions.  I believe everyone who follows global ice realizes that the much of the ice is new.  It is reported not to be thinner in all places.  Also an interesting note:  there are places around the Bering Sea now covered in ice that were actually ice-free in 1980.</p>
<p>Let us remember that some scientists have said that Artic Ice will be gone by 2013.  Let us see whether Coleman&#8217;s statement turns out to be more accurate than that projection.</p>
<p>For those that take hope in news of Southern Hemispheric ice is expansion:  a  a colder climate most likely not a desired outcome for the human race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Stanton</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-13944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arch Stanton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-13944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pamela,

What do you know about Martian ice caps?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pamela,</p>
<p>What do you know about Martian ice caps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Stanton</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-13943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arch Stanton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-13943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pamela Grey,

I’m not really qualified to discuss ice caps on other planets in depth, (not that I’m qualified to discuss much of anything in depth) but I will comment that concerning Mars I have read that the recent south polar melting has been accounted for by observed albedo change.


(sorry about the multiple posts above I will know to be more patient in the future.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pamela Grey,</p>
<p>I’m not really qualified to discuss ice caps on other planets in depth, (not that I’m qualified to discuss much of anything in depth) but I will comment that concerning Mars I have read that the recent south polar melting has been accounted for by observed albedo change.</p>
<p>(sorry about the multiple posts above I will know to be more patient in the future.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Stanton</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-13937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arch Stanton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-13937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell, I can agree with everything you said except for your use of “excuses” in the last. Personally I think they are possible explanations.

Off topic but vaguely related to our conversation:

Some folks here may be interested in these reviews of a paper that came out in Geophysical Research Letters this week concerning the poor performance of climate models in Antarctica.

http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2008/antarctica.jsp

(If this is a duplicate post I apologize. My last posts seemed to disappear. I have not been here long enough to know if I should just be patient. Or a spam filter is blocking my links.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell, I can agree with everything you said except for your use of “excuses” in the last. Personally I think they are possible explanations.</p>
<p>Off topic but vaguely related to our conversation:</p>
<p>Some folks here may be interested in these reviews of a paper that came out in Geophysical Research Letters this week concerning the poor performance of climate models in Antarctica.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2008/antarctica.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2008/antarctica.jsp</a></p>
<p>(If this is a duplicate post I apologize. My last posts seemed to disappear. I have not been here long enough to know if I should just be patient. Or a spam filter is blocking my links.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Gray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-13934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-13934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arch:

Please discuss the icecaps on other planets in light of our own icecaps and your understanding of the cause of recent thinning on these other planets.  Mars would be a good place to start.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arch:</p>
<p>Please discuss the icecaps on other planets in light of our own icecaps and your understanding of the cause of recent thinning on these other planets.  Mars would be a good place to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Stanton</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-13931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arch Stanton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-13931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell, I can agree with everything you said except for your use of “excuses” in the last. Personally I think they are possible explanations.

Off topic but vaguely related to our conversation:

Some folks here may be interested in these reviews of a paper that came out in Geophysical Research Letters this week concerning the poor performance of climate models in Antarctica.

I provide 2 spins on it:

http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2008/antarctica.jsp

http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/bromsnow.htm

(If this is a duplicate post I apologize. My last post seemed to disappear. I have not been here long enough to know if I should just be patient.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell, I can agree with everything you said except for your use of “excuses” in the last. Personally I think they are possible explanations.</p>
<p>Off topic but vaguely related to our conversation:</p>
<p>Some folks here may be interested in these reviews of a paper that came out in Geophysical Research Letters this week concerning the poor performance of climate models in Antarctica.</p>
<p>I provide 2 spins on it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2008/antarctica.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2008/antarctica.jsp</a></p>
<p><a href="http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/bromsnow.htm" rel="nofollow">http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/bromsnow.htm</a></p>
<p>(If this is a duplicate post I apologize. My last post seemed to disappear. I have not been here long enough to know if I should just be patient.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Stanton</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-13930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arch Stanton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-13930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell, I can agree with everything you said.

Off topic but vaguely related to our conversation:

Some folks here may be interested in these reviews of a paper that came out in Geophysical Research Letters this week concerning the poor performance of climate models in Antarctica.

I provide 2 spins on it (neither of which are harsh. I am sure some blogger will rant about it):

http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2008/antarctica.jsp

http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/bromsnow.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell, I can agree with everything you said.</p>
<p>Off topic but vaguely related to our conversation:</p>
<p>Some folks here may be interested in these reviews of a paper that came out in Geophysical Research Letters this week concerning the poor performance of climate models in Antarctica.</p>
<p>I provide 2 spins on it (neither of which are harsh. I am sure some blogger will rant about it):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2008/antarctica.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2008/antarctica.jsp</a></p>
<p><a href="http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/bromsnow.htm" rel="nofollow">http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/bromsnow.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Florida</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/05/05/an-open-letter-to-environmentalists/#comment-13920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom in Florida]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=1192#comment-13920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Even your previous pro-AGW link says the Artic reached 96% of normal ice. However they spin it to fit the AGW agenda. Try looking at real stats without the spin.&quot;

Normal????? Normal for what, the last 30 years? How can anyone claim that 30 years out of a 4 billion year history tells us what is normal. I recall an article on this blog or over at junkscience.com about the early 1900&#039;s Arctic having so little ice that ships were able to sail through the Northwest passage. Perhaps we should take our &quot;average sea ice&quot; calculations back that far.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even your previous pro-AGW link says the Artic reached 96% of normal ice. However they spin it to fit the AGW agenda. Try looking at real stats without the spin.&#8221;</p>
<p>Normal????? Normal for what, the last 30 years? How can anyone claim that 30 years out of a 4 billion year history tells us what is normal. I recall an article on this blog or over at junkscience.com about the early 1900&#8242;s Arctic having so little ice that ships were able to sail through the Northwest passage. Perhaps we should take our &#8220;average sea ice&#8221; calculations back that far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

