Comments on: ABC Poll: GW rates a big fat zero

By: Perry

Perry — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:14:06 +0000

We should all be grateful that Tuibguy is such a self abuser over AGW. It follows that little Tuibguys will not be following in his wayward thinking. How did he escape a meaningful education. I blame his parents that Tuibguy is so mentally challenged. Still, there’s nowt so queer as folk.

By: Global Warming: Mostly Hot Air « The Global Warming Hoax

Global Warming: Mostly Hot Air « The Global Warming Hoax — Fri, 16 May 2008 14:38:32 +0000

[...] threat of rising sea levels, Al has played all his cards. A recent ABC News/Washington Post [17] poll found that precisely zero per cent of Americans — yes, zero, that’s not a typo — rated global [...]

By: A Conservative Christian Environmental Blog - 'Cause the World's Not Ours to Mess Up [Ps 24:1]

Fri, 16 May 2008 13:03:05 +0000

[...] A recent ABC News/Washington Post poll found that precisely zero per cent of Americans — yes, zero, that’s not a typo — rated global [...]

By: Pajamas Media » Global Warming: Mostly Hot Air

Pajamas Media » Global Warming: Mostly Hot Air — Wed, 14 May 2008 08:16:26 +0000

[...] the threat of rising sea levels, Al has played all his cards. A recent ABC News/Washington Post poll found that precisely zero per cent of Americans — yes, zero, that’s not a typo — [...]

By: Global Warming Dying Fast

Global Warming Dying Fast — Wed, 07 May 2008 03:38:20 +0000

[...] one noticing it. Add to that the news of a couple weeks back that no one in an ABC News poll of 1,197 US adults named Global Warming as an issue in this year’s elections. No one. [...]

By: Jim Peden

Jim Peden — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:20:47 +0000

Tuibguy is obviously a rote learner, not a cognitive thinker. With this type of mind, repetition is the key to learning.

Let’s try a different approach:

CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.
CO2 lags, not leads, temperature. The future does not influence the past.

There, that should do it…

Jim Peden

By: jcspe

jcspe — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:41:54 +0000

See the 4/22/08 version of:

http://www.grimmy.com/comics.php

Cartoonists are never early to a party. A cartoon like this one reflects an impression by the artist that a lot of people will be in tune to his sense of the ridiculous.

By: Evan Jones

Evan Jones — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:41:17 +0000

Funny you should say that. I am currently working on it.

By: Not Deceived

Not Deceived — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:50:03 +0000

I believe people are starting to sense that the relentless ‘climate campaign’ has very little to do with science but is actually being used to push a much deeper agenda. Being an Environmental Scientist myself the whole thing made no sense until I began to investigate where this phenomenon had come from, who was funding it, and what their motivation is. As bizarre and conspiratorial as this sounds it is the only logical explanation. We should fight them and condemn them with their own words. To that there is no defense.

http://www.green-agenda.com/

By: Evan Jones

Evan Jones — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:23:40 +0000

it shows that CO2 levels can be thousands of times above today’s levels and average temperature of the planet never rises above 22C. Not thousands, but around 20 times. (385 ppm vs. 7000 ppm.).

By: Jon

Jon — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:10:36 +0000

After this past winter there is no one left who is willing to believe it is a problem. On top of it, Gore’s campaign is doing a terrible job of getting good endorsees. Al Sharpton and Pat Robertson. Newt Gingrich and Nancy Pelosi. These people are liked by few and disliked by many. The message “from the left and right” is being rejected by that all important middle, especially middle America who is tired of shoveling snow.

By: old construction

old construction — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:55:46 +0000

tuibguy says
AGW is a real problem.
How many parts of the CO2 drives the climate theory must be falsified by observed data before you understand that CO2 does not drive the climate!
1) CO2 lags temperture.
2) The upper part of the troposhere is not warming faster than the surface.
3) oceans evporation is not causing heat trapping clouds.
4) oceans have been cooling for the last few years eventhough CO2 have been increasing.
5) global tempature have not been increasing since 1998 eventhough CO2 have increasing.
The EPA has every right to deal with harmful pollution. But CO2 is a non harmful gas. Without it we would die.

By: David Jay

David Jay — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:43:26 +0000

Tuib:

Undeniable to whom?

Can you show me your evidence (and models are NOT evidence, they are mechanisms of hypothesis)?

Perhaps the increasing satellite temperatures over the last 10 years?

Perhaps the warming of the oceans?

By: Neil Fisher

Neil Fisher — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:25:19 +0000

Sure, keep on heating the planet and call the science nonsense,

If only it were science in the true sense…

By: Chris

Chris — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:16:35 +0000

Tuibguy,

CO2 is not a pollutant. I exhale it everyday. Actually, the lack of real pollutants have warmed the planet. Less volcanic ash, less aerosols emitted by the Former Soviet Union, etc., in combination with a warmer sun have caused surface temperatures to rise. This is why troposhere temperatures have not risen faster than surface temperatures, in direct contrast to GW theory.