<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar Cycle 23 Forecasts &#8211; The Movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-30952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crosspatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-30952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I notice that the bottom has fallen out of the sunspot numbers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/sunspot.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;according to the graph&lt;/a&gt; at NOAA.  Any idea when they are going to polish up their crystal balls and issue another &quot;prediction&quot; or must I go down the street and see what Madame Sophia has to say?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice that the bottom has fallen out of the sunspot numbers <a href="http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/sunspot.gif" rel="nofollow">according to the graph</a> at NOAA.  Any idea when they are going to polish up their crystal balls and issue another &#8220;prediction&#8221; or must I go down the street and see what Madame Sophia has to say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opps, my last should have been on Mauna Loa&#039;s lower Co2 concentrations post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opps, my last should have been on Mauna Loa&#8217;s lower Co2 concentrations post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if Mauan Loa&#039;s lower CO2 levels could be the result of very little &lt;a href=&quot;http://volcano.wr.usgs.gov/maunaloastatus.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;activity&lt;/a&gt; from the volcano.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Mauan Loa&#8217;s lower CO2 levels could be the result of very little <a href="http://volcano.wr.usgs.gov/maunaloastatus.php" rel="nofollow">activity</a> from the volcano.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepslope</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deepslope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthony, just realized that I posted my lengthy contribution to the wrong thread - if you can accept it, could you please select a more appropriate spot?

thank you,

ulrich

&lt;strong&gt;REPLY:&lt;/strong&gt; Unfortunately I am unable to move comments due to limits in the software, the on;y way they can show up on the right thread is for you to copy/paste and resubmit there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony, just realized that I posted my lengthy contribution to the wrong thread &#8211; if you can accept it, could you please select a more appropriate spot?</p>
<p>thank you,</p>
<p>ulrich</p>
<p><strong>REPLY:</strong> Unfortunately I am unable to move comments due to limits in the software, the on;y way they can show up on the right thread is for you to copy/paste and resubmit there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepslope</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deepslope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this morning I was dismayed reading the following on &quot;globalchange group&quot;, a moderated discussion group with a predominantly academic bent on IPCC doctrine:

under the thread &quot;Does Solar Variability affect Climate&quot;, one conclusion was: &quot;Scientists have produced further compelling evidence showing that
modern-day climate change is not caused by changes in the Sun&#039;s
activity.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/sci/tech/7327393.stm

Looks like another denialist claim shot down with data.&quot;

This prompted me to respond with the following (it will be interesting to see if this contribution is accepted): 

&quot;To describe the sun&#039;s contribution to climate change since time immemorial as &quot;a denialist&#039;s claim shot down by data&quot; is an absurd statement, not worthy of a supposedly august forum like this one. Quite apart from Singer&#039;s publications and presentations, there is a huge body of literature, including peer-reviewed, on the correlation of the earth&#039;s climate system with continuously changing solar parameters.  Some of the entry portals have already been mentioned in this thread and a simple Internet search will lead you in the right direction.

Remember, CO2 is a trace gas crucial for photosynthesis (and green houses are known to produce excellent crops at elevated CO2 concentrations); 1934 is the well-documented warmest year of the past 150; there has been slight cooling since 1998 (more pronounced since 2004 - see new satellite data), and much more. And yes, as everybody can check (below) after surviving an exceptionally harsh winter: Northern Hemisphere Sea Ice Area is ahead substantially from a year ago and close to the mean from 1979 - 2000, whereas Southern Hemisphere Sea Ice is considerably above the same mean...

Example for North: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/current.365.jpg - Southern and global data are also there. 

As an aside: the colonization of Greenland by the Vikings and Alpine Glaciers that had receded much farther than currently are deniers&#039; illusions? as are the Little Ice Age and the year without summer (1816), since Mann&#039;s careful and universally applicable data proved that these climate events could never have happened...?  

Are you willing to take credit for the likely global cooling of the near future, together with Al Gore? The particulate load from new not-so-clean coal plants may soon be rivalling well-documented volcanic contributions to the mitigation of solar inputs... 

All this does not mean that one should burn fossil fuels with unbridled abandon. But look at the emerging land use and food cost catastrophe built on an out-of-control biofuel craze!  Isn&#039;t it time to move toward a differentiated approach to natural resource usage and conservation, to strive toward living in harmony with the constantly changing metabolism of Earth?  Isn&#039;t it time to re-evaluate arrogant attitudes like &quot;Save the Planet&quot; and learn to understand what&#039;s truly going on? Isn&#039;t it time to step away from the polarizing debates between Hot Heads and to stop creating all that new Hot Air?  

Is it not time to check the data a bit more carefully, including the often sloppy practices of measuring and recording terrestrial temperatures? Please study other relevant blogs (such as Climate Science, Watt&#039;s up with that, ICECAP and others) with an objective mind before denouncing the solar information as denialist claptrap...

respectfully,

UL 

(my credentials: independent oceanographer specializing in deep-sea imaging, holding a broad US Patent on aquatic habitat health using biomonitoring methods)&quot;

Given statements such as &quot;Looks like another denialist claim shot down with data&quot;, it&#039;s difficult to refrain from cynicism.  I&#039;ll try harder while elucidating certain experimental oceanographic approaches in my new blog - deepslope - coming soon to wordpress.com

I really appreciate the great work, Anthony! 

ulrich]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this morning I was dismayed reading the following on &#8220;globalchange group&#8221;, a moderated discussion group with a predominantly academic bent on IPCC doctrine:</p>
<p>under the thread &#8220;Does Solar Variability affect Climate&#8221;, one conclusion was: &#8220;Scientists have produced further compelling evidence showing that<br />
modern-day climate change is not caused by changes in the Sun&#8217;s<br />
activity.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/sci/tech/7327393.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/sci/tech/7327393.stm</a></p>
<p>Looks like another denialist claim shot down with data.&#8221;</p>
<p>This prompted me to respond with the following (it will be interesting to see if this contribution is accepted): </p>
<p>&#8220;To describe the sun&#8217;s contribution to climate change since time immemorial as &#8220;a denialist&#8217;s claim shot down by data&#8221; is an absurd statement, not worthy of a supposedly august forum like this one. Quite apart from Singer&#8217;s publications and presentations, there is a huge body of literature, including peer-reviewed, on the correlation of the earth&#8217;s climate system with continuously changing solar parameters.  Some of the entry portals have already been mentioned in this thread and a simple Internet search will lead you in the right direction.</p>
<p>Remember, CO2 is a trace gas crucial for photosynthesis (and green houses are known to produce excellent crops at elevated CO2 concentrations); 1934 is the well-documented warmest year of the past 150; there has been slight cooling since 1998 (more pronounced since 2004 &#8211; see new satellite data), and much more. And yes, as everybody can check (below) after surviving an exceptionally harsh winter: Northern Hemisphere Sea Ice Area is ahead substantially from a year ago and close to the mean from 1979 &#8211; 2000, whereas Southern Hemisphere Sea Ice is considerably above the same mean&#8230;</p>
<p>Example for North: <a href="http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/current.365.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/current.365.jpg</a> &#8211; Southern and global data are also there. </p>
<p>As an aside: the colonization of Greenland by the Vikings and Alpine Glaciers that had receded much farther than currently are deniers&#8217; illusions? as are the Little Ice Age and the year without summer (1816), since Mann&#8217;s careful and universally applicable data proved that these climate events could never have happened&#8230;?  </p>
<p>Are you willing to take credit for the likely global cooling of the near future, together with Al Gore? The particulate load from new not-so-clean coal plants may soon be rivalling well-documented volcanic contributions to the mitigation of solar inputs&#8230; </p>
<p>All this does not mean that one should burn fossil fuels with unbridled abandon. But look at the emerging land use and food cost catastrophe built on an out-of-control biofuel craze!  Isn&#8217;t it time to move toward a differentiated approach to natural resource usage and conservation, to strive toward living in harmony with the constantly changing metabolism of Earth?  Isn&#8217;t it time to re-evaluate arrogant attitudes like &#8220;Save the Planet&#8221; and learn to understand what&#8217;s truly going on? Isn&#8217;t it time to step away from the polarizing debates between Hot Heads and to stop creating all that new Hot Air?  </p>
<p>Is it not time to check the data a bit more carefully, including the often sloppy practices of measuring and recording terrestrial temperatures? Please study other relevant blogs (such as Climate Science, Watt&#8217;s up with that, ICECAP and others) with an objective mind before denouncing the solar information as denialist claptrap&#8230;</p>
<p>respectfully,</p>
<p>UL </p>
<p>(my credentials: independent oceanographer specializing in deep-sea imaging, holding a broad US Patent on aquatic habitat health using biomonitoring methods)&#8221;</p>
<p>Given statements such as &#8220;Looks like another denialist claim shot down with data&#8221;, it&#8217;s difficult to refrain from cynicism.  I&#8217;ll try harder while elucidating certain experimental oceanographic approaches in my new blog &#8211; deepslope &#8211; coming soon to wordpress.com</p>
<p>I really appreciate the great work, Anthony! </p>
<p>ulrich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: len</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[len]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pam said,

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;The colder climate will affect Canadian and Russian wheat production. Fruit orchards that have marched northward during global warming will freeze. Heating and industrial fuel will be hard to find this time around since oil isn’t sweet anymore. Any kind of animal or vegetable production north of the 45th parallel will likely be reduced due to short and harsh growing seasons.&quot;&gt;

Hey, don&#039;t abandon all of Canada!  I agree, the Landscheidt Minimum is nigh but cereal grains will remain North of the 48th, although I&#039;m not sure the Mennonites (Fort Vermilion, Alberta, Canada) that won best &#039;red spring wheat&#039; at the Chicago World Fair in the 18th century will be even getting a good crop of green feed at the 58th parallel in 10 years.

... but Winterpeg will no longer be the center of Canadian Soy production because even the summers will be cool, canola will be all we can grow.  Lower grades of corn will be questionable, #1 Wheat will be confined to the absolute southern Canadian Praries, Niagra Penninsula and Acadian fruit production will cease (BC will be OK due to microclimate) ....

So, not the end of the world, but I think Archibald&#039;s thesis that you can just drive 2 hours north (100 miles) to your new climatic conditions pretty well matches the Maunder Minimum experience from the paintings I&#039;ve looked at ;)&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pam said,</p>
<blockquote cite="The colder climate will affect Canadian and Russian wheat production. Fruit orchards that have marched northward during global warming will freeze. Heating and industrial fuel will be hard to find this time around since oil isn’t sweet anymore. Any kind of animal or vegetable production north of the 45th parallel will likely be reduced due to short and harsh growing seasons.">
<p>Hey, don&#8217;t abandon all of Canada!  I agree, the Landscheidt Minimum is nigh but cereal grains will remain North of the 48th, although I&#8217;m not sure the Mennonites (Fort Vermilion, Alberta, Canada) that won best &#8216;red spring wheat&#8217; at the Chicago World Fair in the 18th century will be even getting a good crop of green feed at the 58th parallel in 10 years.</p>
<p>&#8230; but Winterpeg will no longer be the center of Canadian Soy production because even the summers will be cool, canola will be all we can grow.  Lower grades of corn will be questionable, #1 Wheat will be confined to the absolute southern Canadian Praries, Niagra Penninsula and Acadian fruit production will cease (BC will be OK due to microclimate) &#8230;.</p>
<p>So, not the end of the world, but I think Archibald&#8217;s thesis that you can just drive 2 hours north (100 miles) to your new climatic conditions pretty well matches the Maunder Minimum experience from the paintings I&#8217;ve looked at ;)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Graves</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lloyd Graves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the previous comment, the point is warmer and wetter climate allowed the Anasazi to thrive but when the temperature and moisture levels declined into the LIA the Anasazi culture vanished.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the previous comment, the point is warmer and wetter climate allowed the Anasazi to thrive but when the temperature and moisture levels declined into the LIA the Anasazi culture vanished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Graves</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lloyd Graves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rise to prominence and eventual decline and &quot;mysterious&quot; and complete disappearance of the Anasazi tribe in the American southwest, http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/cultural/northamerica/anasazi.html shows an almost perfect correlation with MWP as depicted in 
Figure 4 of Archibald
http://nzclimatescience.net/images/PDFs/archibald2007.pdf  
 The rise stars about 490 A.D. and by 1350 A.D. they had completely disappeared. Quite a mystery. 

P.S. apologies if I have not submitted the links properly]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rise to prominence and eventual decline and &#8220;mysterious&#8221; and complete disappearance of the Anasazi tribe in the American southwest, <a href="http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/cultural/northamerica/anasazi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/cultural/northamerica/anasazi.html</a> shows an almost perfect correlation with MWP as depicted in<br />
Figure 4 of Archibald<br />
<a href="http://nzclimatescience.net/images/PDFs/archibald2007.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://nzclimatescience.net/images/PDFs/archibald2007.pdf</a><br />
 The rise stars about 490 A.D. and by 1350 A.D. they had completely disappeared. Quite a mystery. </p>
<p>P.S. apologies if I have not submitted the links properly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torange</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torange]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quote - Anna V :

It will also mean the flight from suburbia and isolated houses because of security reasons and heating reasons too. It is not by accident that villages came to be with people huddled together in small rooms.

The bird flu will love global cooling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote &#8211; Anna V :</p>
<p>It will also mean the flight from suburbia and isolated houses because of security reasons and heating reasons too. It is not by accident that villages came to be with people huddled together in small rooms.</p>
<p>The bird flu will love global cooling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveSadlov</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveSadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pamela Gray - you have perfectly described &quot;The Second Era Of Human Migration&quot; - AKA &quot;The Second Dark Ages.&quot; 

In a sense, we have probably been toying with the threshold since the late 1700s. We could get pushed over the edge any time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pamela Gray &#8211; you have perfectly described &#8220;The Second Era Of Human Migration&#8221; &#8211; AKA &#8220;The Second Dark Ages.&#8221; </p>
<p>In a sense, we have probably been toying with the threshold since the late 1700s. We could get pushed over the edge any time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna v</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anna v]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pamela Gray

If the cooling prevails, the economic squeeze will take us to an environment of scarcity rather than the one of plenty we have lived through the last decades.
This means grandmother&#039;s tips on parsimony and making ends meet and using leftovers for a fancy name meal have to also be recalled. 

It will also mean the flight from suburbia and isolated houses because of security reasons and heating reasons too. It is not by accident that villages came to be with people huddled together in small rooms.

I am keeping my fingers crossed for a &quot;reasonable cooling&quot; that will stop the AGW stampede without destroying our life rhythms. The two next winters may do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pamela Gray</p>
<p>If the cooling prevails, the economic squeeze will take us to an environment of scarcity rather than the one of plenty we have lived through the last decades.<br />
This means grandmother&#8217;s tips on parsimony and making ends meet and using leftovers for a fancy name meal have to also be recalled. </p>
<p>It will also mean the flight from suburbia and isolated houses because of security reasons and heating reasons too. It is not by accident that villages came to be with people huddled together in small rooms.</p>
<p>I am keeping my fingers crossed for a &#8220;reasonable cooling&#8221; that will stop the AGW stampede without destroying our life rhythms. The two next winters may do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Gray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...and if you like Washington wine made from Washington grapes, or Oregon wine made from Oregon grades, kiss it goodby because its back to apple wine for the lot of us.  My grandmother used to make the best apple wine I have ever tasted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and if you like Washington wine made from Washington grapes, or Oregon wine made from Oregon grades, kiss it goodby because its back to apple wine for the lot of us.  My grandmother used to make the best apple wine I have ever tasted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Gray</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[re: what investors should look for

The colder climate will affect Canadian and Russian wheat production.  Fruit orchards that have marched northward during global warming will freeze.  Heating and industrial fuel will be hard to find this time around since oil isn&#039;t sweet anymore.  Any kind of animal or vegetable production north of the 45th parallel will likely be reduced due to short and harsh growing seasons.

Invest in wheat futures here in the US because we will once again be supplying the world with bread.  Invest in southern climate fruit production (and learn to like the taste and texture of winter apples).  Buy a sheep herd and learn how to shear wool.  Cotton will be king once again because ALL oil will go for heating and industry, not clothes.  Invest in wood heat if you are lucky.  Wind energy may not work so well since cold climates reduce wind.  Solar panels may be a bust but don&#039;t throw them away just yet.  If you plant a garden, plant short season crops and learn how to preserve food since transportation of food from one part of the country to another will be VERY expensive due to fuel prices (see comment about sweet oil above).  Learn how to build greenhouses.  Try to remember EVERYTHING your grandmother taught you about anything at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: what investors should look for</p>
<p>The colder climate will affect Canadian and Russian wheat production.  Fruit orchards that have marched northward during global warming will freeze.  Heating and industrial fuel will be hard to find this time around since oil isn&#8217;t sweet anymore.  Any kind of animal or vegetable production north of the 45th parallel will likely be reduced due to short and harsh growing seasons.</p>
<p>Invest in wheat futures here in the US because we will once again be supplying the world with bread.  Invest in southern climate fruit production (and learn to like the taste and texture of winter apples).  Buy a sheep herd and learn how to shear wool.  Cotton will be king once again because ALL oil will go for heating and industry, not clothes.  Invest in wood heat if you are lucky.  Wind energy may not work so well since cold climates reduce wind.  Solar panels may be a bust but don&#8217;t throw them away just yet.  If you plant a garden, plant short season crops and learn how to preserve food since transportation of food from one part of the country to another will be VERY expensive due to fuel prices (see comment about sweet oil above).  Learn how to build greenhouses.  Try to remember EVERYTHING your grandmother taught you about anything at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Gosselin (aka AGWscoffer)</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pierre Gosselin (aka AGWscoffer)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[anna v
Excellent!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anna v<br />
Excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Sage</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/29/solar-cycle-23-forecasts-the-movie/#comment-10052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vic Sage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=966#comment-10052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AGW is true, now let us prove it!

Clearly the CO2 concentration at Mona Loa has some sort of an effect on the Solar Cycle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AGW is true, now let us prove it!</p>
<p>Clearly the CO2 concentration at Mona Loa has some sort of an effect on the Solar Cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

