If he’d just look beyond Tim Flannery’s book he might actually learn something, but it appears that is his total bibliography on the subject of weather and climate change.

I don’t think he wants to. He’s said more than once that he thrives on such “abuse”, which is why he entered the way he did. Such people don’t deserve respect. You have to give it to get it.

REPLY: Well I’ve found a stable connection now, so I’m back on awhile.

I really tried to reach this man, but he’s now spouting that the Atlanta tornado is a direct result of AGW, like our friend John Kerry did a couple of weeks ago. Davison has this bizarre claim on his scribbleblog that the “weather today is fundamentally different than even less than 50 years ago”. But the Palm Sunday tornado outbreak apparently is something he never heard of, or maybe the super tornado outbreak of April 3-4 1974 with 148 tornadoes is lost to him as well. In fact there is an entire list of tornado outbreaks going back to the 1600′s in North America.

If he’d just look beyond Tim Flannery’s book he might actually learn something, but it appears that is his total bibliography on the subject of weather and climate change.

especially comments 68 through 70.

“Mankind fiddled while earth burned.”

REPLY: Alright that does it. Your comments there have nothing to do with the AMS statement, you are just trolling for traffic and putting out your own brand of snark.

You get your wish as you’ve hinted from day one. As others say, you are indeed a crackpot and you are the first and only person to be permanently banned from this forum. Congratulations. I’ve been patient, I’ve tried to help you understand, I’ve tolerated your constant need for confrontation. No more.

And by the way Dr. Davison, the reason I closed the other thread is that you are so “web inept” I didn’t want you to accuse me of deleting your posts when they didn’t show up right away. Because, I’m traveling this weekend, so posts wouldn’t show up for hours, as has been the case today. I’m writing this from laptop on a WiFi hotspot at a Starbuck’s. But you took exception to that note also, scribbling some insinuations on your blog, then baiting people here to go look at them. So since I’m damned if I do and damned if I don’t with your reasoning, the choice was simple. Nothing gets through to you, and from the trail you’ve left, it appears most others on the Internet that have encountered you agree. Your inability to grasp fundamental concepts of physical processes or to carry on a rational discussion without confrontation is your downfall. I don’t have the time to coddle you anymore, be gone.

I’m sure you’ll copy all this into your blog then claim how terribly mistreated you’ve been. That’s your MO, go for it.

While we are at it, here is a sample of extreme climate hyperbole featuring a gigantic “future hurricane.”

Tom Moriarty

[Ok, one more diversion: Go Warming!]

My parents run a dairy farm in Minnesota. Wouldn’t it be great if they could get a heads up if a drought is expected this summer? They would plant more drought resistant forms of crops (if available). I think the policy statement touches on this indirectly. The state of the science is not yet to this point yet, but if such a point is reached, then the positive economic impact that it would have on our country would be tremendous.

We need better predictions of Pacific SSTs to improve climate prediction. We need more ocean observations, research, and modeling improvements. It would pay for itself via resulting economic growth because of better climate forecasts.

I suggested their statement should concentrate on improving the weather station network as it is in depolorable condition, as shown by work on this site.

Needless to say I hung you onto today’s Ladder.
Thanks again,
Bruce
ediotr~New Orleans News Ladder