<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun blank again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 12:26:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Eagle Feather</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-12872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Eagle Feather]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-12872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other day I was reminded about what I learned in geology decades ago - for the last several hundred thousand years ice over a mile thick was typical for North America and Northern Europe. Short interglacial periods dotted that period, with periods of about 10,000 years of warmth be typical in the last 100,000 years. Our last Ice Age ended about 11 thousand years ago and so we are about 1000 years over due. The Mini Ice Age we saw several hundred years ago would be typical for the beginning phase of a new Ice Age. Obviously the sun has been going through long dim cycles for the last several hundred thousand years. Yet NASA and modern Science (perhaps in an effort to protect Wall Street and prevent panic in the streets) is trying very hard to pretend like this interglacial period will go on forever. Actually the only thing that MIGHT save us is a larger carbon footprint.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day I was reminded about what I learned in geology decades ago &#8211; for the last several hundred thousand years ice over a mile thick was typical for North America and Northern Europe. Short interglacial periods dotted that period, with periods of about 10,000 years of warmth be typical in the last 100,000 years. Our last Ice Age ended about 11 thousand years ago and so we are about 1000 years over due. The Mini Ice Age we saw several hundred years ago would be typical for the beginning phase of a new Ice Age. Obviously the sun has been going through long dim cycles for the last several hundred thousand years. Yet NASA and modern Science (perhaps in an effort to protect Wall Street and prevent panic in the streets) is trying very hard to pretend like this interglacial period will go on forever. Actually the only thing that MIGHT save us is a larger carbon footprint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Meeus</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-7187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jean Meeus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-7187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the SOHO image of today, March 6, at 08:00 UT I notice at extreme right a very small sunspot. It is situated in a small lighter region of the sun&#039;s surface. Being close to the sun&#039;s equator, that small spot again belongs to sunspot cycle No.23. Maybe it is again a short-living spot. Anyway, being close to the sun&#039;s western limb, it will soon disappear behind the limb.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the SOHO image of today, March 6, at 08:00 UT I notice at extreme right a very small sunspot. It is situated in a small lighter region of the sun&#8217;s surface. Being close to the sun&#8217;s equator, that small spot again belongs to sunspot cycle No.23. Maybe it is again a short-living spot. Anyway, being close to the sun&#8217;s western limb, it will soon disappear behind the limb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattN</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-7101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MattN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-7101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to www.solarcycle24.com, there was another VERY small sunspot yesterday (3/4) that disappeared so quickly, it didn&#039;t even get a number.

This cycle is just sputtering....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.solarcycle24.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.solarcycle24.com</a>, there was another VERY small sunspot yesterday (3/4) that disappeared so quickly, it didn&#8217;t even get a number.</p>
<p>This cycle is just sputtering&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveSadlov</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-7093</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveSadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-7093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I looked up Seven Tomorrows and the scenario name is actually &quot;The Beginnings of Sorrow&quot; (quite Biblical!). In that scenario, there is worsening climate and mass infrastructure failures. After a few years, steam locomotives are being used again, and the US is run by the Mafia. Etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked up Seven Tomorrows and the scenario name is actually &#8220;The Beginnings of Sorrow&#8221; (quite Biblical!). In that scenario, there is worsening climate and mass infrastructure failures. After a few years, steam locomotives are being used again, and the US is run by the Mafia. Etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Carden Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-7068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Carden Chronicles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 07:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-7068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;End to Global Warming? Return of An Ice Age?&lt;/strong&gt;

Last week, articles began to surface discussing how the US National Climatic Data Center was reporting that  January&#039;s temperature was 0.3F BELOW the average temperature from 1901-2000.   Additionally, the Arctic sea ice, that the Global Warming Fana...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>End to Global Warming? Return of An Ice Age?</strong></p>
<p>Last week, articles began to surface discussing how the US National Climatic Data Center was reporting that  January&#8217;s temperature was 0.3F BELOW the average temperature from 1901-2000.   Additionally, the Arctic sea ice, that the Global Warming Fana&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveSadlov</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-7033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveSadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-7033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hawken, not Hawkins.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hawken, not Hawkins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveSadlov</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-7032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveSadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-7032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say what you will (and believe me, I have!) about Hawkins et al. That book &quot;Seven Tomorrows&quot; is still knocking around up there in me noggin&#039; ....

The scenario which I think would best describe things, should we incur another Maunder, is &quot;The Beginning of Sorrows.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say what you will (and believe me, I have!) about Hawkins et al. That book &#8220;Seven Tomorrows&#8221; is still knocking around up there in me noggin&#8217; &#8230;.</p>
<p>The scenario which I think would best describe things, should we incur another Maunder, is &#8220;The Beginning of Sorrows.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-6996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-6996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s the irony, BC.  An unanticipated long term cool-off is going to be disastrous, and not just for the poor and powerless(I like that one) of the world.
================================]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the irony, BC.  An unanticipated long term cool-off is going to be disastrous, and not just for the poor and powerless(I like that one) of the world.<br />
================================</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Cobb</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-6991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Cobb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-6991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If the priests of the global warming cult really cared about humanity, they would be talking about the possibility of global cooling.&quot;
That&#039;s pretty much it in a nutshell.  They have an agenda, and it ain&#039;t about
science, or truth, and most certainly not about what is good for humanity.  The AGW?AGCC propaganda machine will continue on, regardless of what the science says.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If the priests of the global warming cult really cared about humanity, they would be talking about the possibility of global cooling.&#8221;<br />
That&#8217;s pretty much it in a nutshell.  They have an agenda, and it ain&#8217;t about<br />
science, or truth, and most certainly not about what is good for humanity.  The AGW?AGCC propaganda machine will continue on, regardless of what the science says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill in Vigo</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-6867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill in Vigo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-6867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Max D.  I do remember the late (Easter) freeze here in Alabama.  We lost most of the fruit crop from the north 1/2 of the state.  and then the drought went into the extreme phase and all the crops were lost to the tune of less than 1/3 of expected production which included our winter wheat crop.  

Yes I agree just a little cooling isn&#039;t a good thing.

Bill  (another 2 cents)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max D.  I do remember the late (Easter) freeze here in Alabama.  We lost most of the fruit crop from the north 1/2 of the state.  and then the drought went into the extreme phase and all the crops were lost to the tune of less than 1/3 of expected production which included our winter wheat crop.  </p>
<p>Yes I agree just a little cooling isn&#8217;t a good thing.</p>
<p>Bill  (another 2 cents)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Tisdale</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-6851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Tisdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-6851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Austin:  Both ACRIM and PMOD are composites of satellite derived TSI readings.  ACRIM stands for Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor.  ACRIM data is available here: http://www.acrim.com/

PMOD stands for Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos/World Radiation Center. (You asked.) PMOD Data here: http://www.pmodwrc.ch/pmod.php?topic=tsi/composite/SolarConstant
 
The differences are discussed at both sites.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Austin:  Both ACRIM and PMOD are composites of satellite derived TSI readings.  ACRIM stands for Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor.  ACRIM data is available here: <a href="http://www.acrim.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.acrim.com/</a></p>
<p>PMOD stands for Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos/World Radiation Center. (You asked.) PMOD Data here: <a href="http://www.pmodwrc.ch/pmod.php?topic=tsi/composite/SolarConstant" rel="nofollow">http://www.pmodwrc.ch/pmod.php?topic=tsi/composite/SolarConstant</a></p>
<p>The differences are discussed at both sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otter</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-6828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-6828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OT~ I am surprised one &#039;john cross&#039; has not come by to dispute your figures on the various temperature charts, Anthony.

I do have a question related to this thread: I had read elsewhere the claim that the sun is already Two years past the point of the new cycle beginning. I am going to take it partially as that there is a delay from the first burst of new sunspots, as you have charted above... but they must be using somewhat different criteria for that assumption?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT~ I am surprised one &#8216;john cross&#8217; has not come by to dispute your figures on the various temperature charts, Anthony.</p>
<p>I do have a question related to this thread: I had read elsewhere the claim that the sun is already Two years past the point of the new cycle beginning. I am going to take it partially as that there is a delay from the first burst of new sunspots, as you have charted above&#8230; but they must be using somewhat different criteria for that assumption?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austin</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-6825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[austin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-6825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob,

What are the acronyms you use and the source for the data you presented?

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>What are the acronyms you use and the source for the data you presented?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Arndt</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-6823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Arndt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-6823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

One way is to compare the number of spotless days to other cycles. If you correlate that number to other cycles you may be able to figure it out.  It gives you a Rmax of about 62 like SC15 and SC13. I think it maybe a little higher. There is also the chance of a Grant Minima.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>One way is to compare the number of spotless days to other cycles. If you correlate that number to other cycles you may be able to figure it out.  It gives you a Rmax of about 62 like SC15 and SC13. I think it maybe a little higher. There is also the chance of a Grant Minima.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Jones</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/02/28/sun-blank-again/#comment-6812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=791#comment-6812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BT: Very interesting ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BT: Very interesting &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

