14 Responses to Thanks to all my readers!

1. Russ says:

   February 18, 2008 at 6:35 pm

   Awesome Anthony! Your readership will continue to grow as you explain climate change science in terms we can all understand. Your experience in making the complex understandable is paying big dividends. Keep those interesting facts coming, as I am sharing them with my NC Media Watch readers at every opportunity.

   Russ
2. Raven says:

   February 18, 2008 at 7:05 pm

   You have hit a few home runs this month with Jan temps and the solar analysis. I am finding links back to your site in the oddest of places.

   Thanks for all of the hard work maintaining the blog.
3. chillguy33 says:

   February 18, 2008 at 7:57 pm

   Hey, Anthony,

   Which Nino/Nina predicts Global Freezing?

   Just askin’

   Great Blog, though; could even be stellar.
4. ultimate175 says:

   February 18, 2008 at 8:27 pm

   Anthony, I enjoy perusing your site most days, and I’ve learned a lot. Any subject that carries this much political, social, and/or cultural baggage deserves all the skepticism it gets. Count me a skeptic. I was wondering, being rather new to this issue, if you could compile and post an “acronym definition” page on your site. There are so many, and it’s hard for a newbie to keep all the organizations, measurement devices, networks, etc. straight. Just a suggestion.

   REPLY: Done! See the Glossary page link on the toolbar under the cloud header
5. Evan Jones says:

   February 18, 2008 at 8:47 pm

   Looks like a hockey stick to me!
6. Magnus A says:

   February 18, 2008 at 11:16 pm

   Congratulation!

   This is a tendency, I think. That AGW sites lose traffic but skeptics gain visitors!

   Watch this stats for RealClimate and ClimateAudit at December 2007 (AGW loses its audience):

   http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2393/2104125677_8b92006465_o.jpg

   (The same picture, but smaller:
   http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2189/2104904056_4e14d37a05_o.jpg )

   Well, this isn’t important. The importance is a scientific debate, not numbers of believers. But this is encouraging since most government and a discourse that silence people (and I will also say bad “science”) is on the losing side. :-)
7. Magnus A says:

   February 18, 2008 at 11:42 pm

   Btw this blog is very well worth more visitors; an authentic hockey stick graph!
8. Gary Gulrud says:

   February 19, 2008 at 3:24 am

   Indeed you have an impressive array of positives going: nice clean vivid presentation; balanced, data-centered content that possibly avoids argumentation for its own sake; good blog cross-link relationships; an appeal to a wide variety of interests–nice work!
   And I think Magnus’s traffic comparisons is telling; analogous to the D-Day landing having been acheived.
9. Stan Needham says:

   February 19, 2008 at 4:48 am

   Three cheers for hockey. Well done.
10. crosspatch says:

    February 19, 2008 at 8:10 am

    Very nice site, Mr. Watts. I stop by at least a couple of times a day to see if anything new has been posted. Informative content laid out in a matter that is attractive and easy to read.

    Thank you.
11. Roger A. Pielke Sr. says:

    February 19, 2008 at 9:05 am

    Anthony – Congratulations for this major achievement. Keep up your very important work! Roger
12. Evan Jones says:

    February 19, 2008 at 9:49 am

    “analogous to the D-Day landing having been acheived.”

    Battle of Moscow. (Kluge is thrown back, but double envelopment not achieved.)

    The Battle of Britain is behind us, but Stalingrad and Kursk lie ahead. Overlord is not yet in sight.

    As Churchill put it, not the beginning of the end, but the end of the beginning.

    Bang! Bang! Bang!
    Goes the farmers’ gun.
    Run, rabbit! run!
    Run! Run! Run!
13. Bill in Vigo says:

    February 19, 2008 at 6:24 pm

    what a great site. I started on Surfaceststions moved on to Climateaudit and found Wattsupwiththat. I learn more here and pass it on to others on a local blog with some hard core warmers. (They refuse to recognize new studies because the authors haven’t enough peer reviewed papers)

    Anthony Please keep up the good work.

    Bill
14. Raven says:

    February 25, 2008 at 8:34 am

    Anthony,

    I thought you might be tickled to be included in this list of sites:

    “Antarctic ice-cover was at its most extensive since satellite records began in 1979, 30 per cent above the January average (see such websites as the US National Climate Data Center, Cryosphere Today and Watt’s Up With That).”

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/02/24/do2402.xml

Comments are closed.