<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California USHCN station surveys are complete</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveSadlov</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveSadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I look forward to having Steve Mosher and John V revisit things, incorporating these data. Then later, there can be a revisiting with complete CONUS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to having Steve Mosher and John V revisit things, incorporating these data. Then later, there can be a revisiting with complete CONUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Jones</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What BiV said. What Russ said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What BiV said. What Russ said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill in Vigo</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill in Vigo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done Anthony,
     I am afraid that you are right in that the findings of your survey is an embarassment to the powers that be.  Of course as is repeated by several of the bloggers in another blog I coment on, &quot;You don&#039;t have to have a picture to know there is a bias just compare with other similar rural stations.&quot;  I guess that would work if we knew that they were quality stations.  

Again,  WELL DONE

Bill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done Anthony,<br />
     I am afraid that you are right in that the findings of your survey is an embarassment to the powers that be.  Of course as is repeated by several of the bloggers in another blog I coment on, &#8220;You don&#8217;t have to have a picture to know there is a bias just compare with other similar rural stations.&#8221;  I guess that would work if we knew that they were quality stations.  </p>
<p>Again,  WELL DONE</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s funny that those who believe AGW are classified as &quot;unskeptical&quot;. That should be a red flag to those scientists who believe, they&#039;ve lost their natural skepticism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that those who believe AGW are classified as &#8220;unskeptical&#8221;. That should be a red flag to those scientists who believe, they&#8217;ve lost their natural skepticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations on prevailing in your efforts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on prevailing in your efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[henry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can now ask the person who made the overall quality map to make a &quot;blowup&quot; of Calif, showing the quality of the state (if he has time).

This also allows others to start some work of their own (comparing it to other data, like the &quot;rural vs non-rural&quot; sites etc).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can now ask the person who made the overall quality map to make a &#8220;blowup&#8221; of Calif, showing the quality of the state (if he has time).</p>
<p>This also allows others to start some work of their own (comparing it to other data, like the &#8220;rural vs non-rural&#8221; sites etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger A. Pielke Sr.</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger A. Pielke Sr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthony - Congratulations on this very important accomplishment! Roger]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony &#8211; Congratulations on this very important accomplishment! Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/california-ushcn-station-surveys-are-complete/#comment-3821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthony,
Ellen and I were please to help with the survey. Will you do a stand alone analysis of the California sites?  It would be interesting to compare the California site ratings with the LaDochy Study results, that show increased warming.  We have a list of the sites in the shape file he sent.   I note that Watts Up is listed in the new climate change site, Climate Debate Daily, under the Skeptical Blogs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony,<br />
Ellen and I were please to help with the survey. Will you do a stand alone analysis of the California sites?  It would be interesting to compare the California site ratings with the LaDochy Study results, that show increased warming.  We have a list of the sites in the shape file he sent.   I note that Watts Up is listed in the new climate change site, Climate Debate Daily, under the Skeptical Blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

