<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Audit is back online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Howerton</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/#comment-88379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Howerton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/#comment-88379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still can&#039;t get CA.

REPLY: look at the dat of this post]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still can&#8217;t get CA.</p>
<p>REPLY: look at the dat of this post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/#comment-1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s in California but not in an earthquake zone? Is that even possible? lol.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s in California but not in an earthquake zone? Is that even possible? lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Walton</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Walton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/#comment-1254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, now that sounds like a heck of a nice machine build.  I would love to know all the details.

Sheesh, annoyance over some cross-posts?  Is this person serious?  Some folks you just can&#039;t please, I guess.

You guys must have had a long seven-eight days.  I&#039;ll bet you are happy the fixes are in.  I am pleased to see you back up and flying.  Now you can return your attention to the progress of Surface Stations, climate science, climate science auditing, and fielding the insults, ad hominem attacks, derision, and steady stream of abuse spewed by your detractors.

Keep up the great work.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, now that sounds like a heck of a nice machine build.  I would love to know all the details.</p>
<p>Sheesh, annoyance over some cross-posts?  Is this person serious?  Some folks you just can&#8217;t please, I guess.</p>
<p>You guys must have had a long seven-eight days.  I&#8217;ll bet you are happy the fixes are in.  I am pleased to see you back up and flying.  Now you can return your attention to the progress of Surface Stations, climate science, climate science auditing, and fielding the insults, ad hominem attacks, derision, and steady stream of abuse spewed by your detractors.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sergei</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sergei]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/#comment-1253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve great work!  Anthony as well. The both of you are to be commended to pursuing this debate in a professional manner.

I have been a skeptic since 1975 when the original movement of global cooling started and fueled by the infamous Newsweek publication. I was in Meteorology school at the time and as well as a serious observer of weather and climate since 1966. I changed majors to computer science in &#039;78.  I only switched because I did not want to make a life long career in academia where you publish or perish - you need the funding.  If you follow the money, the money is clearly in the funding for GW and the AGW variant.

To be a skeptic in good standing I try to read both sides.  And speaking of the other side, RealClimate.org is challenging. It defies my understanding of the scientific process. I have tried posting there a couple of times and neither of posts even get through.  Does anyone else have similar experience?  Regardless... I see Timothy Chase has invited you to a tea in Seattle to settle your differences.  Just curious.. will that ever happen?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve great work!  Anthony as well. The both of you are to be commended to pursuing this debate in a professional manner.</p>
<p>I have been a skeptic since 1975 when the original movement of global cooling started and fueled by the infamous Newsweek publication. I was in Meteorology school at the time and as well as a serious observer of weather and climate since 1966. I changed majors to computer science in &#8217;78.  I only switched because I did not want to make a life long career in academia where you publish or perish &#8211; you need the funding.  If you follow the money, the money is clearly in the funding for GW and the AGW variant.</p>
<p>To be a skeptic in good standing I try to read both sides.  And speaking of the other side, RealClimate.org is challenging. It defies my understanding of the scientific process. I have tried posting there a couple of times and neither of posts even get through.  Does anyone else have similar experience?  Regardless&#8230; I see Timothy Chase has invited you to a tea in Seattle to settle your differences.  Just curious.. will that ever happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/08/16/climate-audit-is-back-online/#comment-1252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unsubscribing from your blog RSS because of duplicate content with CA. I wish you wouldn&#039;t cross-post!

Bye-bye :(.

*** NOTE FROM MODERATOR - no need for the short fuse, duplicate posts existed for a good reason and that is because:

1) They were requested by Steve McIntyre
2) The Climate Audit blog has been down for upgrades
3) Many readers have migrated here, becuase they couldn&#039;t see CA due to DNS issues over the past couple of days.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unsubscribing from your blog RSS because of duplicate content with CA. I wish you wouldn&#8217;t cross-post!</p>
<p>Bye-bye :(.</p>
<p>*** NOTE FROM MODERATOR &#8211; no need for the short fuse, duplicate posts existed for a good reason and that is because:</p>
<p>1) They were requested by Steve McIntyre<br />
2) The Climate Audit blog has been down for upgrades<br />
3) Many readers have migrated here, becuase they couldn&#8217;t see CA due to DNS issues over the past couple of days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

