Comments on: Standards for weather station siting using the new CRN http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/07/03/standards-for-weather-station-siting-using-the-new-crn/ The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change Tue, 29 May 2012 09:07:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: MikeW http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/07/03/standards-for-weather-station-siting-using-the-new-crn/#comment-612 Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:41:06 +0000 http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/standards-for-weather-station-siting-using-the-new-crn/#comment-612 With the number of problems that some of these have and if a Class 5 is referring to only a single artificial heating source at 5C correction, then I suspect you may have to add a few more classes.

I mean how would you rate Marysville or Livermore for example using this system?
And for that matter how much correction would be needed?
Or would they just be considered as rejects because the errors are impossible to untangle?

]]> By: Anthony Watts http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/07/03/standards-for-weather-station-siting-using-the-new-crn/#comment-611 Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:55:22 +0000 http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/standards-for-weather-station-siting-using-the-new-crn/#comment-611 I plan on waiting to start applying the rating criteria when we’ve reached the 10% point of the nationwide survey, and then add the rating to each site as the survey progresses.

]]> By: Bishop Hill http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/07/03/standards-for-weather-station-siting-using-the-new-crn/#comment-610 Wed, 04 Jul 2007 05:24:42 +0000 http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/standards-for-weather-station-siting-using-the-new-crn/#comment-610 Is the idea to assess each station as you go along, or to do them all at the end?

]]>