<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Solar Anniversary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/</link>
	<description>Commentary on puzzling things in life, nature, science, weather, climate change, technology, and recent news by Anthony Watts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:54:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Sustainability&#8221; runs amok in my town of Chico &#171; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-53894</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Sustainability&#8221; runs amok in my town of Chico &#171; Watts Up With That?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 04:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-53894</guid>
		<description>[...] the few people on the task force that actually walked the talk, as I had put solar on my home and a local school, plus I drive an electric car (though I&#8217;ve since upgraded to a newer model [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the few people on the task force that actually walked the talk, as I had put solar on my home and a local school, plus I drive an electric car (though I&#8217;ve since upgraded to a newer model [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-448</guid>
		<description>So water vapor is a component of smog?  Every time a human (or any mammal) breathes out, we&#039;re contributing to smog?  (Not to mention every time one of us boils water.  Oh yeah, and by extension, anyplace with high humidity also has high &quot;smog&quot; levels--under that criteria, I&#039;d hate to live in rural MN or in S LA!)  Now I don&#039;t know how much H20 a person contributes as compared to a car, but surely if you multiply all the humans on the earth you&#039;re going to be able to assert a lot of &quot;smog&quot; is simply due to human breath.  I&#039;d just concentrate on the particulates, NOx, and O3 when discussing smog, just to avoid sounding a little silly.

Just an observation.

*** REPLY: Well the word &quot;smog&quot; is a portmanteau of smoke and fog. Fog is water vapor. Sometimes the fog component is much lower, sometimes higher, but whatever the ratio, water vapor is a part of it, but not necessarily the driver of it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So water vapor is a component of smog?  Every time a human (or any mammal) breathes out, we&#8217;re contributing to smog?  (Not to mention every time one of us boils water.  Oh yeah, and by extension, anyplace with high humidity also has high &#8220;smog&#8221; levels&#8211;under that criteria, I&#8217;d hate to live in rural MN or in S LA!)  Now I don&#8217;t know how much H20 a person contributes as compared to a car, but surely if you multiply all the humans on the earth you&#8217;re going to be able to assert a lot of &#8220;smog&#8221; is simply due to human breath.  I&#8217;d just concentrate on the particulates, NOx, and O3 when discussing smog, just to avoid sounding a little silly.</p>
<p>Just an observation.</p>
<p>*** REPLY: Well the word &#8220;smog&#8221; is a portmanteau of smoke and fog. Fog is water vapor. Sometimes the fog component is much lower, sometimes higher, but whatever the ratio, water vapor is a part of it, but not necessarily the driver of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-447</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m disappointed the N&amp;R didn&#039;t contact you before commenting.  I had really hoped the new editor, Evan Tuchinsky was going to raise the bar for the N&amp;R.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m disappointed the N&amp;R didn&#8217;t contact you before commenting.  I had really hoped the new editor, Evan Tuchinsky was going to raise the bar for the N&amp;R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Miller</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-446</guid>
		<description>What is it with the CN&amp;R? Do they have some personal vendetta against you? I, personally, gave up on the CN&amp;R a long time ago. It used to be an interesting read while I was eating lunch but now it&#039;s just another tabloid rag.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it with the CN&amp;R? Do they have some personal vendetta against you? I, personally, gave up on the CN&amp;R a long time ago. It used to be an interesting read while I was eating lunch but now it&#8217;s just another tabloid rag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Walton</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>David Walton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 03:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>The CN&amp;R is a joke, no one I know takes anything they write seriously (although I am sure they have their followers down at the &quot;Peace and Justice&quot; Center).  There are worse papers -- check out Reno&#039;s version for some real gut churning &quot;reportage&quot;.

CN&amp;R is Chico&#039;s own version of Weekly World News, except that they probably actually believe what they print.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CN&amp;R is a joke, no one I know takes anything they write seriously (although I am sure they have their followers down at the &#8220;Peace and Justice&#8221; Center).  There are worse papers &#8212; check out Reno&#8217;s version for some real gut churning &#8220;reportage&#8221;.</p>
<p>CN&amp;R is Chico&#8217;s own version of Weekly World News, except that they probably actually believe what they print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jankowski</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jankowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/my-solar-anniversary/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>Because you&#039;re investigating weather stations, it&#039;s automatically assumed you have no interest in being energy-conscious.  I guess the Chico News &amp; Review probably also assumes someone like Al Gore would be among the most energy conscious folks in the world.

My next vehicle will be a hybrid, the home I hope to start constructing in the next 1-2 yrs will have a strong solar element, etc, but I also have a &quot;skeptical interest&quot; as you do.

It probably won&#039;t be too long before the Chico News &amp; Review accuses us of being paid for by big oil.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because you&#8217;re investigating weather stations, it&#8217;s automatically assumed you have no interest in being energy-conscious.  I guess the Chico News &amp; Review probably also assumes someone like Al Gore would be among the most energy conscious folks in the world.</p>
<p>My next vehicle will be a hybrid, the home I hope to start constructing in the next 1-2 yrs will have a strong solar element, etc, but I also have a &#8220;skeptical interest&#8221; as you do.</p>
<p>It probably won&#8217;t be too long before the Chico News &amp; Review accuses us of being paid for by big oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
