<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet TV finally taking hold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/05/19/internet-tv-finally-taking-hold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/05/19/internet-tv-finally-taking-hold/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s most viewed site on global warming and climate change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 09:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Walton</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2007/05/19/internet-tv-finally-taking-hold/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Walton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 19:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/05/19/internet-tv-finally-taking-hold/#comment-379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dang, Anthony, where the heck have I been?  I missed this completely!  Oh, well, I am there now.  Congratulations on your accomplishment.  Is there anything you can&#039;t do?  (I hope no pigs were harmed or humiliated in this venture.)

I have not subscribed to cable for at least 20 years and have no plans for the next 20, given I live that long.

IMHO cable has always been exorbitant for the &quot;service&quot; it provides.  My experience (and later second hand experience) with cable companies revealed that they have a core business philosophy based upon a cult of arrogance and surly evasion (when you could could actually reach a real person)  To be fair, AT&amp;T and many other communications companies have adopted a similar customer service model.

That said -- competition is EVERYTHING!  Cable companies and perhaps even broadcast will fast become a dinosaur or shape up.  Personally, I think cable deserves extinction and hope broadcast is eternal.  Nevertheless I am convinced that on demand is the wave of the future.  Heck, I am the perfect subscriber, I am an on demand kind of guy.

With regard to video I do just fine with broadcast.  I have to admit that I would enjoy some pay TV content, particularly those channels that produce historical and science programming.  Nevertheless, I can get all the printed history and science my heart desires with a mouse click on a &quot;high speed&quot; Internet connection.  Video streams typically suck at my end but there is more printed material nearly instantly available to me because of the Internet than I could read in a dozen lifetimes.  I certainly wouldn&#039;t want to spend a dozen lifetimes watching the majority of content available on cable TV or even satellite.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, Anthony, where the heck have I been?  I missed this completely!  Oh, well, I am there now.  Congratulations on your accomplishment.  Is there anything you can&#8217;t do?  (I hope no pigs were harmed or humiliated in this venture.)</p>
<p>I have not subscribed to cable for at least 20 years and have no plans for the next 20, given I live that long.</p>
<p>IMHO cable has always been exorbitant for the &#8220;service&#8221; it provides.  My experience (and later second hand experience) with cable companies revealed that they have a core business philosophy based upon a cult of arrogance and surly evasion (when you could could actually reach a real person)  To be fair, AT&amp;T and many other communications companies have adopted a similar customer service model.</p>
<p>That said &#8212; competition is EVERYTHING!  Cable companies and perhaps even broadcast will fast become a dinosaur or shape up.  Personally, I think cable deserves extinction and hope broadcast is eternal.  Nevertheless I am convinced that on demand is the wave of the future.  Heck, I am the perfect subscriber, I am an on demand kind of guy.</p>
<p>With regard to video I do just fine with broadcast.  I have to admit that I would enjoy some pay TV content, particularly those channels that produce historical and science programming.  Nevertheless, I can get all the printed history and science my heart desires with a mouse click on a &#8220;high speed&#8221; Internet connection.  Video streams typically suck at my end but there is more printed material nearly instantly available to me because of the Internet than I could read in a dozen lifetimes.  I certainly wouldn&#8217;t want to spend a dozen lifetimes watching the majority of content available on cable TV or even satellite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

